Some challenges like M67, NGC 2419 and NGC 2903
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 12:49 pm
Last evening, an evening full of challenges. Objects of the Month are not so obvious here in Bortle 8/9 area. It seemed bright enough to the naked eye but my first look through the telescope at M44 told me that high in the atmosphere there must be a lot of cirrus cloud cover.
Still just stubborn and off to M67. That one turned out to be somewhat disappointing even by city standards. I really had seen that one better! I could not make out more than a dozen stars and some background glow. Not even with some higher magnifications. Alas. The sketch is proof of it. A larger telescope might have come in handy, were it not for the fact that my mount had been put in a corner of my little garden, to provide space for the construction racks for the painters. So this time I had to make do with my 102mm grab@go scope.
As a result, although I was sheltered under the racks, I could not look toward the zenith. SoNGC 2419 fell completely out of view. Given its surface brightness, I was not very confident about it tonight anyway. In the past it had given me quite a few headaches. It should be doable from the city, though. Attached is a 2022 sketch from my little garden.
Then I switched to anNGC number that is currently object of the month here in the Netherlands: NGC2903, an extra-galactic galaxy in the head of the Lion. Not exactly the brightest either, but still doable in my memory. I had seen it not very long ago.
Somewhat in despair, I hopped over to where to expect NGC2903 according to SkySafari. Nothing. I checked with MeMstar ( a Frenchgoto ). After aligning on Regulus it appeared to indicate the same spot. Star patterns were correct. No galaxy. Let's leave it at that, shall we?
No, just open up the whole arsenal. Hood on, no more side light. Leica-zoom eyepiece in, zooming can be helpful sometimes. Let the eyes get used to darkness; takes some time but in the end it pays off. Turn Eyeshield up, no warm air from the eye fogging up on the cold lens. Beware of fogging, keep distance, take the smaller field of view for granted. Drag in all directions, motion is noticeable and use especially peripheral ( averted) vision. With the eye make circles in the image field. Still nothing?
Normally say you doubt you saw it. And then keep it to a "no." A "no" to autosuggestion and wishful thinking. Despite the pitfall of those last two, I dare not say "no." No "no" to that immensely weak glimmer that seemed to appear twice very briefly. Too brief and too little to say "yes." But "no" is also not correct....
I made a sketch of it. The galaxy is actually still shown too brightly in the sketch. But well, otherwise there is nothing left to sketch.... :-)
Click the images for a nicer view.
Still just stubborn and off to M67. That one turned out to be somewhat disappointing even by city standards. I really had seen that one better! I could not make out more than a dozen stars and some background glow. Not even with some higher magnifications. Alas. The sketch is proof of it. A larger telescope might have come in handy, were it not for the fact that my mount had been put in a corner of my little garden, to provide space for the construction racks for the painters. So this time I had to make do with my 102mm grab@go scope.
As a result, although I was sheltered under the racks, I could not look toward the zenith. So
Then I switched to an
Somewhat in despair, I hopped over to where to expect NGC2903 according to SkySafari. Nothing. I checked with MeMstar ( a French
No, just open up the whole arsenal. Hood on, no more side light. Leica-zoom eyepiece in, zooming can be helpful sometimes. Let the eyes get used to darkness; takes some time but in the end it pays off. Turn Eyeshield up, no warm air from the eye fogging up on the cold lens. Beware of fogging, keep distance, take the smaller field of view for granted. Drag in all directions, motion is noticeable and use especially peripheral ( averted) vision. With the eye make circles in the image field. Still nothing?
Normally say you doubt you saw it. And then keep it to a "no." A "no" to autosuggestion and wishful thinking. Despite the pitfall of those last two, I dare not say "no." No "no" to that immensely weak glimmer that seemed to appear twice very briefly. Too brief and too little to say "yes." But "no" is also not correct....
I made a sketch of it. The galaxy is actually still shown too brightly in the sketch. But well, otherwise there is nothing left to sketch.... :-)
Click the images for a nicer view.