I have never seen a refractor like that , looks like a reflector!The Wave Catcher wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2023 3:47 amHi Joe,JoeG wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2023 5:15 pm Oz Eclipse, I may have made an ignorant mistake in buying this scope. Admittedly, I know little to nothing about telescopes. As mentioned I had the reflector, but in what little research I did, I found that reflectors require a but more care & maintenance (collimation) & I thought I'd get the refractor to get around all that.
But I took my telescope out last night because I saw Saturn & figured I'd take a look & I was quite disappointed. Possibly due to me not knowing what I was doing, but I tried the 25mm with & without the 2x Barlow & then the 10mm the same way & I couldn't see more than a bright blob.
My old reflector I at least saw the shape of an orb with a ring (not clear, but you could tell what it was).
I'm debating returning it while I can & saving up for something bigger/better. I don't know.
If your 102 mm refractor is an achromat, it may be suffering from chromatic aberration at powers high enough to view Saturn well. One of my telescopes, my Bresser AR102s 102 mm refractor, was designed for low power views of comets. Saturn was a blob. However, I made a 60 mmaperture mask made from a plastic yogurt lid cleared it up perfectly, enough to see the Cassini Gap clearly. You might try anaperture mask to see if it clears things up for you.
New to all of this
- Richard
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 6:55 am
- 5
- Location: South Africa/Czech Rep
- Status:
Offline
Re: New to all of this
Refractors None
SCT C5 on a SLT mount
Mak 150 Bosma on a EQ5
- The Wave Catcher
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2020 8:59 pm
- 3
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas, U.S.A.
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Photo of the Day
TSS Awards Badges
Re: New to all of this
I have never seen a refractor like that , looks like a reflector!
[/quote]
Yes, it does. People often think I have my Newtonian upside down. Apparently it is a one of a kind. It is a refractor with an internal mirror so no diagonal is needed. Maybe it should be called a reflactor. It makes for a short and fast refractor,
https://www.adorama.com/brar102s00.html
It’s a fast achromat designed for light gathering, wide field, and low power views. I used 60 mm
The point of my response to Joe was to suggest he try an
A fast achromat with a low power eyepiece can have very wide fields of views and pin-point stars.
Astro-Tech AT102ED, 102 mm, F/7, ED Achromatic Refractor
Astro-Tech AT80ED, 80 mm, F/7, ED Achromatic Refractor
Bresser AR102s, 102 mm, f/4.5, Achromatic Refractor
Explore Scientific Twilight I Alt/Az Mount
Bresser Nano Alt/Az Mount
- OzEclipse Online
- Moderator
- Articles: 2
- Posts: 2429
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 8:11 am
- 5
- Location: Young, NSW, Australia, 34S, 148E
- Status:
Online
-
TSS Awards Badges
TSS Photo of the Day
Re: New to all of this
Hi Joe,JoeG wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2023 5:15 pm Oz Eclipse, I may have made an ignorant mistake in buying this scope. Admittedly, I know little to nothing about telescopes. As mentioned I had the reflector, but in what little research I did, I found that reflectors require a but more care & maintenance (collimation) & I thought I'd get the refractor to get around all that.
But I took my telescope out last night because I saw Saturn & figured I'd take a look & I was quite disappointed. Possibly due to me not knowing what I was doing, but I tried the 25mm with & without the 2x Barlow & then the 10mm the same way & I couldn't see more than a bright blob.
My old reflector I at least saw the shape of an orb with a ring (not clear, but you could tell what it was).
I'm debating returning it while I can & saving up for something bigger/better. I don't know.
There are a many reasons why you may not be getting a sharply focused image........
John Baars mentioned using the diagonal to focus. I want to expand on this. Most refractors do not have enough extension in their focuser alone to bring the telescope to infinity focus for straight through viewing. If you insert an eyepiece and look straight through, you can't wind the focuser out far enough to make focus. This could be the blob you are seeing, an out of focus image. That is because the manufacturer has made allowance for the diagonal (right angle viewer) included with your scope to be used all the time. Make sure you have the diagonal inserted when you try to use the telescope. As John said, you can focus on a distant tree or building during the day to confirm that you can achieve focus.
Optical realities
Your refractor objective has a doublet objective. That means the manufacturer, has to grind, polish and figure and coat 4 optical surfaces compared to one on a reflector. That is why, for a set price point, reflectors are usually a better buy. I have no experience with your particular telescope so the following comments are very general.
A moderately high quality 4" refractor probably costs 3-4 times what you paid just for the tube without a mounting. The really high quality refractors are triplets, three glass elements with six surfaces to grind, polish and figure and coat and can cost 10-15 times what you paid.
The telescope objective may be perfectly ok but the eyepieces supplied might be of very low quality. They are not going to give you high quality eyepieces in a budget package. The easiest way to check this is to take your scope to an astronomy club field night, ask if someone will let you try their higher quality eyepieces. If you can't access a club field night, members here probably have some suggestions of cheaper quality eyepieces you can buy or perhaps another Sky Searchers Florida based member could organise an observing session with you?
Magnification
The quality of the optics and the optical resolution (based on diameter of the objective), limit the maximum magnification that can be used. Atmospheric instability limits this further. When the atmosphere is perfectly stable, you can use up to the optical magnification limit. When it is unstable, your magnification is limited. The nominal limit is about 50-60 times per inch of
With your scope, the optics are relatively cheap and probably more suited for low power, wide field deep sky observing. If you can return it and get a full refund, for about the same money, you can get a decent quality 8" dobsonian reflector that will give you much better higher magnified views of the Moon and planets as well as more light gathering to give better views of deep sky objects. You will lose portability and yes you may have to frequently collimate the scope. My 18"
Lack of portability can also be overrated. An 8"
Good luck and keep asking questions.
Joe Cali
Amateur astronomer since 1978...................Web site : http://joe-cali.com/
Scopes: ATM 18" Dob, Vixen VC200L, ATM 6"f7, Stellarvue 102ED, Saxon ED80, WO M70 ED, Orion 102 Maksutov, ST80.
Mounts: Takahashi EM-200, iOptron iEQ45, Push dobsonian with Nexus DSC, three homemade EQ's.
Eyepieces: TV Naglers 31, 17, 12, 7; Denkmeier D21 & D14; Pentax XW10, XW5, Unitron 40mm Kellner, Meade Or 25,12
Cameras : Pentax K1, K5, K01, K10D / VIDEO CAMS : TacosBD, Lihmsec.
Cam/guider/controllers: Lacerta MGEN 3, SW Synguider, Simulation Curriculum SkyFi 3+Sky safari
Memberships Astronomical Association of Queensland; RASNZ Occultations Section; Single Exposure Milky Way Facebook Group (Moderator) (12k members), The Sky Searchers (moderator)
-
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2023 2:38 pm
- Location: Florida
- Status:
Offline
Re: New to all of this
Being the owner of a reflector, I assume you have tried all kinds of ways to focus? You have to use the diagonal too. ( this is probably new to you) Without it the view will be a blur. You can test this in daylight on a very far away object. If you still have a blurred view you can consider sending it back.
I have got some help & have a slightly better understanding of what I'm doing, long way to go
The Orion AstroView 102mm Refractor I have has been set up correctly. I believe the diagonal you speak of is the 90° piece before the eyepiece, if that's correct it is connected to the scope, so we should be good there.
I set up the finder scope to a red light atop the Sunshine skyway Bridge outside my back balcony & its roughly 7- 8 miles from me & I was able to see that just fine, even snapped some pics of it. I'm definitely gonna keep on trying, basically just getting started & maybe got a but frustrated.
This site has been so helpful & everyone is so friendly, I really appreciate all the help!
-
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2023 2:38 pm
- Location: Florida
- Status:
Offline
Re: New to all of this
Thanks Richard, I'm sorry I forgot to mention the older reflector I have is a Bushnell # 78-8831 76mm Reflector on an alt/az mount & I barely ever treated it the way I should have, lost the caps early on so dust, humidity, dirt, stuff in my trunk during transports & such made it quite unusable. + I never know about collimation so there's that.Richard wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2023 3:24 pm Welcome to TSS Joe , well we dont know what size your 'old' reflector is , a 4.5 inch or 114mm is not such a small scope , when mounted on an EQ mount , you have been using it 20 odd years so is it 20 Years old ?
Your new scope a 102 refractor is a fine scope , I personally thing they are the sweet spot and should be much better than same size any other design if made well, I used to have a 102 Skywatcher refractor and was a dog , similar problems to what you say the CA was just too much for all the bright planets , but if you get a good one , I had 3 a WO 80 ed , Tasco 10-te and a Tasco 7-te , all fantastic
I dont have any refractors as I prefer compound scopes as they travel easier as my LP stops me from doing much at home
As for my new scope, I haven't had much time due to cloudy sky's to try much, but what little I have done doesn't seem very good & I'm wondering of I should return it for something bigger, better or if this one cn be used for things I'm interested in (viewing planets, deeper space & also some astrophotography as well (if that's even possible). So I'm kind of in a jam, because I only have until December 29 for the 30 day return, but I'm not sure if i even gave it a fair chance. So, I'm confused. & it doesn't help that I'm just really getting started in all of this & have zero clue what I'm trying to accomplish or how exactly to do it. Thanks for your response!
- SkyHiker
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 2293
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 8:40 pm
- 5
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Photo of the Day
TSS Awards Badges
Re: New to all of this
My experience with Orion is that they provide good value for the money. When searching the reviews, I see that the comments praise the sharp optics. The focal length is long enough, and cheap plossl eyepieces are usually good enough to get started.JoeG wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2023 6:59 pm As for my new scope, I haven't had much time due to cloudy sky's to try much, but what little I have done doesn't seem very good & I'm wondering of I should return it for something bigger, better or if this one cn be used for things I'm interested in (viewing planets, deeper space & also some astrophotography as well (if that's even possible). So I'm kind of in a jam, because I only have until December 29 for the 30 day return, but I'm not sure if i even gave it a fair chance. So, I'm confused. & it doesn't help that I'm just really getting started in all of this & have zero clue what I'm trying to accomplish or how exactly to do it. Thanks for your response!
Another issue is the atmospheric conditions. While I am probably at the bottom of the totem pole for observing, one night I saw Jupiter razor sharp with my Z12, the next night it was all washed out, observing from the same place.
Altogether I think your gear may not be the problem. Maybe it was the atmosphere, maybe it was dew, maybe it was bad focus. If you can look at a remote object in the daytime and get sharp views then it should work at night, too.
- JayTee
- Articles: 2
- Posts: 5651
- Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2019 3:23 am
- 5
- Location: Idaho, USA
- Status:
Offline
-
TSS Awards Badges
TSS Photo of the Day
Re: New to all of this
https://www.astrospheric.com/
∞ AP Scopes: #1: TPO 6" f/9 RC #2: ES 102 f/7 APO #3: ES 80mm f/6 APO
∞ G&G Scopes: #1: Meade 102mm f/7.8 #2: Bresser 102mm f/4.5
∞ Guide Scopes: 70 & 80mm fracs -- The El Cheapo Bros.
∞ Mounts: iOptron CEM70AG, SW EQ6R, Celestron AVX, SLT & GT (Alt-Az), Meade DS2000
∞ Cameras: #1: ZWO ASI294MC Pro #2: 662MC #3: 120MC, Canon T3i, Orion SSAG, WYZE Cam3
∞ Binos: 10X50,11X70,15X70, 25X100 ∞ AP Gear: ZWO EAF and mini EFW and the Optolong L-eXteme filter
∞ EPs: ES 2": 21mm 100° & 30mm 82° Pentax XW: 7, 10, 14, & 20mm 70°
Searching the skies since 1966. "I never met a scope I didn't want to keep."
-
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2023 2:38 pm
- Location: Florida
- Status:
Offline
Re: New to all of this
When someone says or asks me something about my post I click on the " quote marks & type my answer. I get a notification saying it has to be ok'd (paraphrasing), but it's been days & I haven't seen my replys yet.
- helicon Online
- Co-Administrator
- Articles: 598
- Posts: 12429
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 1:35 pm
- 5
- Location: Washington
- Status:
Online
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: New to all of this
Hi Joe. What happens is that new members need to have their first 5 posts approved manually by the moderation team. This discourages spammers. So now you have 5 posts (including the one I just approved) so you should be home free and have your posts show up immediately after hitting the submit button.JoeG wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2023 2:39 pm I think I'm doing something wrong in answering in this forum.
When someone says or asks me something about my post I click on the " quote marks & type my answer. I get a notification saying it has to be ok'd (paraphrasing), but it's been days & I haven't seen my replys yet.
Edit: @JoeG I sent you a private message on this topic as well....
Refractors: ES AR152 f/6.5 Achromat on Twilight II, Celestron 102mm XLT f/9.8 on Celestron Heavy Duty Alt Az mount, KOWA 90mm spotting scope
Binoculars: Celestron SkyMaster 15x70, Bushnell 10x50
Eyepieces: Various, GSO Superview, 9mm Plossl, Celestron 25mm Plossl
Camera: ZWO ASI 120
Naked Eye: Two Eyeballs
Latitude: 48.7229° N
-
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2023 2:38 pm
- Location: Florida
- Status:
Offline
Re: New to all of this
Thank you so much! As I said before, everyone has been so helpful here & I appreciate it a lot!helicon wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2023 2:43 pmHi Joe. What happens is that new members need to have their first 5 posts approved manually by the moderation team. This discourages spammers. So now you have 5 posts (including the one I just approved) so you should be home free and have your posts show up immediately after hitting the submit button.JoeG wrote: ↑Sat Dec 16, 2023 2:39 pm I think I'm doing something wrong in answering in this forum.
When someone says or asks me something about my post I click on the " quote marks & type my answer. I get a notification saying it has to be ok'd (paraphrasing), but it's been days & I haven't seen my replys yet.
Edit: @JoeG I sent you a private message on this topic as well....
I'll check your PM
Where do I find your private message?
- helicon Online
- Co-Administrator
- Articles: 598
- Posts: 12429
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 1:35 pm
- 5
- Location: Washington
- Status:
Online
-
TSS Awards Badges
Re: New to all of this
Refractors: ES AR152 f/6.5 Achromat on Twilight II, Celestron 102mm XLT f/9.8 on Celestron Heavy Duty Alt Az mount, KOWA 90mm spotting scope
Binoculars: Celestron SkyMaster 15x70, Bushnell 10x50
Eyepieces: Various, GSO Superview, 9mm Plossl, Celestron 25mm Plossl
Camera: ZWO ASI 120
Naked Eye: Two Eyeballs
Latitude: 48.7229° N
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute