Our galaxy's black hole not as sleepy as thought: astronomers

Discuss Astrophysics.
Post Reply
User avatar
helicon United States of America
Co-Administrator
Co-Administrator
Articles: 598
Posts: 12442
Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 1:35 pm
5
Location: Washington
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Our galaxy's black hole not as sleepy as thought: astronomers

#1

Post by helicon »

-Michael
Refractors: ES AR152 f/6.5 Achromat on Twilight II, Celestron 102mm XLT f/9.8 on Celestron Heavy Duty Alt Az mount, KOWA 90mm spotting scope
Binoculars: Celestron SkyMaster 15x70, Bushnell 10x50
Eyepieces: Various, GSO Superview, 9mm Plossl, Celestron 25mm Plossl
Camera: ZWO ASI 120
Naked Eye: Two Eyeballs
Latitude: 48.7229° N
User avatar
messier 111 Canada
Moderator
Moderator
Articles: 0
Posts: 9873
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2020 2:49 am
3
Location: Canada's capital region .
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: Our galaxy's black hole not as sleepy as thought: astronomers

#2

Post by messier 111 »

thx .
I LOVE REFRACTORS , :Astronomer1: :sprefac:

REFRACTOR , TS-Optics Doublet SD-APO 125 mm f/7.8 . Lunt 80mm MT Ha Doublet Refractor .

EYEPIECES, Delos , Delite and 26mm Nagler t5 , 2 zoom Svbony 7-21 , Orion Premium Linear BinoViewer .

FILTER , Nebustar 2 tele vue . Apm solar wedge . contrast booster 2 inches .

Mounts , cg-4 motorized , eq6 pro belt drive .

“Your assumptions are your windows on the world. Scrub them off every once in a while, or the light won't come in.”
― Isaac Asimov

Jean-Yves :flags-canada:
User avatar
Michael131313 Mexico
Articles: 0
Posts: 969
Joined: Sun May 12, 2019 5:39 pm
5
Location: San Jose del Valle , Nayarit, Mexico
Status:
Offline

Re: Our galaxy's black hole not as sleepy as thought: astronomers

#3

Post by Michael131313 »

Thanks Michael. But I sm confused or I am missing something. If the BH is 27000 ly away how can we detect x-rays from only 200 years ago?
ES AR 102 102mm, f/6.5, ES 254mm f/5 DOB, Obie 10x50, GSO SV 30mm, ES 68° 20mm, ES 82° 14mm, 11mm, 8.8 mm, 6.8mm, 4.7mm. Twilight 1 mount.
User avatar
helicon United States of America
Co-Administrator
Co-Administrator
Articles: 598
Posts: 12442
Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 1:35 pm
5
Location: Washington
Status:
Offline

TSS Awards Badges

Re: Our galaxy's black hole not as sleepy as thought: astronomers

#4

Post by helicon »

I'm assuming @Michael131313 that this was left opaque in the article. It would seem that the "200 year" event was in fact 27.000 years ago, just that it was only detected as if it were 200 years ago in our space time. Sort of like if Betelgeuse blew up and we witnessed the supernova today it actually would have occurred hundreds of years ago...
-Michael
Refractors: ES AR152 f/6.5 Achromat on Twilight II, Celestron 102mm XLT f/9.8 on Celestron Heavy Duty Alt Az mount, KOWA 90mm spotting scope
Binoculars: Celestron SkyMaster 15x70, Bushnell 10x50
Eyepieces: Various, GSO Superview, 9mm Plossl, Celestron 25mm Plossl
Camera: ZWO ASI 120
Naked Eye: Two Eyeballs
Latitude: 48.7229° N
User avatar
Michael131313 Mexico
Articles: 0
Posts: 969
Joined: Sun May 12, 2019 5:39 pm
5
Location: San Jose del Valle , Nayarit, Mexico
Status:
Offline

Re: Our galaxy's black hole not as sleepy as thought: astronomers

#5

Post by Michael131313 »

Thanks very much for the clarification. I appreciate it.
ES AR 102 102mm, f/6.5, ES 254mm f/5 DOB, Obie 10x50, GSO SV 30mm, ES 68° 20mm, ES 82° 14mm, 11mm, 8.8 mm, 6.8mm, 4.7mm. Twilight 1 mount.
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

Return to “Astrophysics”